Showing posts with label Patrick Rothfuss. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Patrick Rothfuss. Show all posts

Thursday, August 27, 2015

Terry Pratchett in Defense of Fantasy

Patrick Rothfuss has a beautiful blog post about his love of Terry Pratchett and the role Pratchett played in Pat's early development as a writer.

As part of the post, Pat has dug out an interview of Pratchett in The Onion from 1995 that Pat recalls very vividly. It contains a very stirring defense of fantasy as a genre, and I repeat it here:
O: What’s with the big-ass hat? 
Pratchett: Ah… That’s the hat I wear. I don’t know, it… It… That hat, or types like it, I’ve worn for years and years. Because I bought one, and I liked it. And then people started taking photographs of me in it, and now, certainly in the UK, it’s almost a case of if I don’t turn up in my hat people don’t know who I am. So maybe I could just send this hat to signings. I just like hats. I like Australian book tours, because Australians are really, I mean that is the big hat country, Australia. 
O: You’re quite a writer. You’ve a gift for language, you’re a deft hand at plotting, and your books seem to have an enormous amount of attention to detail put into them. You’re so good you could write anything. Why write fantasy? 
Pratchett: I had a decent lunch, and I’m feeling quite amiable. That’s why you’re still alive. I think you’d have to explain to me why you’ve asked that question. 
O: It’s a rather ghettoized genre. 
P: This is true. I cannot speak for the US, where I merely sort of sell okay. But in the UK I think every book— I think I’ve done twenty in the series— since the fourth book, every one has been one the top ten national bestsellers, either as hardcover or paperback, and quite often as both. Twelve or thirteen have been number one. I’ve done six juveniles, all of those have nevertheless crossed over to the adult bestseller list. On one occasion I had the adult best seller, the paperback best-seller in a different title, and a third book on the juvenile bestseller list. Now tell me again that this is a ghettoized genre. 
O: It’s certainly regarded as less than serious fiction. 
P: (Sighs) Without a shadow of a doubt, the first fiction ever recounted was fantasy. Guys sitting around the campfire— Was it you who wrote the review? I thought I recognized it— Guys sitting around the campfire telling each other stories about the gods who made lightning, and stuff like that. They did not tell one another literary stories. They did not complain about difficulties of male menopause while being a junior lecturer on some midwestern college campus. Fantasy is without a shadow of a doubt the ur-literature, the spring from which all other literature has flown. Up to a few hundred years ago no one would have disagreed with this, because most stories were, in some sense, fantasy. Back in the middle ages, people wouldn’t have thought twice about bringing in Death as a character who would have a role to play in the story. Echoes of this can be seen in Pilgrim’s Progress, for example, which hark back to a much earlier type of storytelling. The epic of Gilgamesh is one of the earliest works of literature, and by the standard we would apply now— a big muscular guys with swords and certain godlike connections— That’s fantasy. The national literature of Finland, the Kalevala. Beowulf in England. I cannot pronounce Bahaghvad-Gita but the Indian one, you know what I mean. The national literature, the one that underpins everything else, is by the standards that we apply now, a work of fantasy.
Now I don’t know what you’d consider the national literature of America, but if the words Moby Dick are inching their way towards this conversation, whatever else it was, it was also a work of fantasy. Fantasy is kind of a plasma in which other things can be carried. I don’t think this is a ghetto. This is, fantasy is, almost a sea in which other genres swim. Now it may be that there has developed in the last couple of hundred years a subset of fantasy which merely uses a different iconography, and that is, if you like, the serious literature, the Booker Prize contender. Fantasy can be serious literature. Fantasy has often been serious literature. You have to fairly dense to think that Gulliver’s Travels is only a story about a guy having a real fun time among big people and little people and horses and stuff like that. What the book was about was something else. Fantasy can carry quite a serious burden, and so can humor. So what you’re saying is, strip away the trolls and the dwarves and things and put everyone into modern dress, get them to agonize a bit, mention Virginia Woolf a few times, and there! Hey! I’ve got a serious novel. But you don’t actually have to do that.
(Pauses) That was a bloody good answer, though I say it myself.
I’m looking forward to buying myself a cheese hat.
O: Back to the hat.
P: Let’s go back to the hat… Everybody needs an edge, and if the hat gives you an edge, why not wear a hat? When you get started writing, you’re one of the crowd. If the hat helps, I’ll wear a hat— I’ll wear two hats! In fact, I’m definitely going to buy a cheese hat before I leave here. We’ve never heard of them in the UK, and I can see it as being the latest thing in fashion.
Okay, you can turn the tape back off again.
I loved it. I will file it away next to C.S. Lewis writings on a similar question.

I can also see why it had such a large impact on Pat:
I actually remember where I was when I read that. Right now, twenty years later, I remember where I was sitting as I held the paper and read it.
I’m not going to be cliche and say it changed my life. 
You know what? I am. I’m going to say it. It changed my life.  
Remember what year this was. It was 1995. This was before Harry Potter was written. Before Neil Gaiman wrote Neverwhere. 
Pixar has just released its first movie. There was no Matrix. No Sixth Sense. No Lord of The Rings movies. Pan’s Labyrinth and Hellboy were a decade away. 
There was no Game of Thrones on HBO. Hell, there wasn’t even Legend of the Seeker. Buffy the Vampire Slayer was 2 years away, and even more years from being recognized as brilliant television, rather than silly fluff with vampires. 
I had been writing my fantasy novel for about two years, and while I loved fantasy, I knew deep down, it was something I should feel ashamed of. Fantasy novels were the books I read as a kid, and people picked on me for it. There were no classes on the subject at the University. I knew deep down in my bones that no matter how much I happened to love fantasy, it was all silly bullshit. 
Even these days, people look down on fantasy. They think of it as kid stuff. They dismiss it as worthless. They say not real literature. People say that *NOW* despite the fact that Game of Thrones and The Hobbit and Avengers and Harry Potter are bigger than The Beatles. 
That’s NOW. If you weren’t around back then, you really can’t begin to understand how much worse it was. When I told people I was working on a fantasy novel, a lot of people wouldn’t even really know what I was talking about. 
I would say, “I’m writing a fantasy novel” and people would look at me with earnest confusion and concern in their eyes, and they would say, “Why?” 
Then I read that article, and it filled me with hope. With pride.
I, too, remember hiding my interest in SFF growing up in the 1980s. And being ashamed of admitting to that interest. I remember having my English teacher tease me in front of the class about liking books in the genre when we were required to talk about our summer reading. I wish I had read Pratchett then, too.

Sunday, August 23, 2015

Hugo Fallout

Last night, the winners of the Hugo Awards were announced. To no-ones great surprise, but to my personal disappointment, "No Award" was the result in 5 categories. To put this in context, in the entire history of the Hugo Awards, No Award had only won in a total of 5 categories before last night.

When voting for myself, I had elected to avoid using the No Award option. This was in part because I wanted to avoid this outcome, but also because I did not feel that I had a clear enough grasp of the quality of prior award winners to make a judgment as to whether the nominees this year were markedly inferior to past winners. But I am not surprised by the result, given the amount of vitriol spilled on the web over the vote.

I am a bit surprised by some of the awards, as well as by the information contained in the nomination and final vote tallies which were also released. On the final vote tallies:
  1. Best Novel. The voting was very tight between Three Body Problem, the eventual winner which I loved, and Goblin Emperor, which I disliked intensely. I was also disappointed to see that in the race for lower positions, No Award beat out Skin Game, a worthy nomination from the puppy slates.
  2. Best Novelette. The single non-puppy nominee, The Day the World Turned Upside Down, won, despite being a mostly forgettable self-indulgent whine-fest about a boy who must deal with an actual, but not always internally consistent, reversal of gravity that coincides with his own metaphorical world turning upside down after being dumped.
  3. Best Short Story. No Award won in a landslide over Totaled which I thought was a very worthwhile piece of writing.
  4. Best Related Work. No Award won in a landslide over The Hot Equations, from which I learned a lot.
  5. Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form. I was pleasantly surprised to see that the logically inconsistent and stunningly idiotic Interstellar finished fourth, although was disappointed to see that it placed above The Lego Movie.
  6. Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form. I was very pleasantly surprises to see Orphan Black rewarded, even if the nominated episode was not the best the show has ever offered up.
  7. Best Editor, Long Form. Very disappointed, but not surprised, to see Toni Weisskopf trounced by No Award.
  8. John W. Campbell Award. No surprise to see Wesley Chu deservedly dominate, but a little surprised to see so little love for Kary English.
  9. Best Fan Writer. Not a huge surprise to see Laura Mixon win, especially after the heady endorsement by George R.R. Martin (see here and here). Hell, even I drank the Kool Aid and voted for her. But since casting that vote, I have looked deeper into the matter and now believe that I made a terrible mistake; this was a poorly researched hit piece. I'd like to think that the voters will come to look back on this choice with regret in the same way that I have.
As for the nominations, I was surprised to find that:
  1. Best Novel. Andy Weir's brilliant The Martian and Jeff Vandemeer's Annihilation, came in only12th and 17th, respectively, in the nominations. At least Andy has the movie grosses to look forward to.
  2. Best Novella. Patrick Rothfuss's The Slow Regard of Silent Things, which I thoroughly enjoyed, just missed out on a nomination.
  3. Best Novelette. Scott Lynch's A Year and a Day in Old Therandane came in only 11th, while contributions by Joe Abercrombie and Patrick Rothfuss to the same volume did not register (I enjoyed all three of them).
  4. Best Related Work. Volume 2 of William Patterson's Heinlein biography came in 11th, while Jill Lepore's brilliant Secret History of Wonder Woman came in 12th. Both would have missed out even absent the puppies, which is a travesty.
  5. Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form. X-Men: Days of Future Past came in 9th, which seems crazy to me (I loved it).
  6. Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form. Orphan Black only barely received a nomination.
The fall-out over this result will no doubt continue for several weeks or months and I will have more to write about it later.

Wednesday, August 5, 2015

Book Review: Patrick Rothfuss The Slow Regard of Silent Things

One of these days, I will write a review of the first two volumes in Patrick Rothfuss's Kingkiller Chronicles. When I do, I will explain how I avoided reading these books for a long time and how, when I finally committed to reading them, I hardened my heart and determined to hate them. I will also explain how, despite having many problems with the books, through the sheer power of Rothfuss's beautiful writing---that at times verges on poetic---and skill at drawing characters, I came to love them.

For now, it is enough to note that I am pre-disposed to enjoy anything Rothfuss writes, especially if it is set within the Kingkiller Universe. Which is a good thing, in this case, because The Slow Regard of Silent Things is a weird little book. You know you are in for something weird when the book begins with a Foreword from the author that starts: "You might not want to buy this book."

Rather than telling a traditional story, the book is more of a vignette; a week in the life of a (more or less minor) character named Auri in the Kingkiller Chronicles told from her perspective so that it provides insight into her mind.

And what a mind! As readers of the novels will know, Auri is mad. I am not a psychiatrist or a psychologist and I do not have a copy of the DSM to hand, but it seems to me that Auri displays obsessive-compulsive tendencies, has a tendency to catastrophize and hence may be prone to depression, as well as a bread basket of other emotional and psychological problems. It may be that these problems are also the source of her genius, or the result of them.

Despite the fact that nothing really happens, this short book is beautifully written with all of Rothfuss's trademark skill. I thought that Rothfuss's attempts to describe the mind of Auri were, on the whole, quite believable, and hence that it made a very interesting character study. And for readers of the novels, there are hints at the importance Auri will play in the concluding book of the trilogy, and new glimpses of the world that Rothfuss has created.

If you have never read anything else by Rothfuss, this is not the place to start, but for fans of the books it is a must read. On my patented ratings scale, for a non-reader of the novels I would give this 6 out of 10 as the beauty of the prose is offset by the unconventional structure; but for readers and fans like me ...

R4 Rating: 8 out of 10.